{"action":"Upgrade openclaw to 2026.4.25 or later.","affected":[{"fixed":"2026.4.25","introduced":"0"}],"component":"openclaw","cve_ids":["CVE-2026-53809"],"ecosystem":"npm","epss":0.00093,"exploited":false,"fixed_versions":["2026.4.25"],"ghsa_id":"GHSA-p39j-x9h5-q66m","id":"tcs_01M5KG2CBS18H18TSNF5XH3YHK","modified_at":"2026-07-02T17:26:31.747453Z","published_at":"2026-07-02T16:58:51Z","references":["https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-p39j-x9h5-q66m","https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-p39j-x9h5-q66m","https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53809","https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw","https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-provider-alias-confusion-in-embedded-runner-policy"],"severity":{"label":"low","score":3.8},"sources":[{"source":"osv","source_id":"GHSA-p39j-x9h5-q66m","url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-p39j-x9h5-q66m"}],"summary":"OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases"}